Thursday, February 25, 2021
Home Breaking News Suspended El Kaouakibi remains a member of the Open VLD group

Suspended El Kaouakibi remains a member of the Open VLD group

Article link

The Open VLD statutory committee has clarified its decision last week. Sihame El Kaouakibi is suspended for six months but remains a member of Open VLD. As a member of the group, she must observe party discipline.

Last week the statutory committee of Open VLD put Flemish Member of Parliament Sihame El Kaouakibi on hold for six months. These are protective measures that must protect the party against reports of possible malpractice at Let’s Go Urban (LGU), the brainchild of El Kaouakibi. It also did not help that the Antwerp Member of Parliament did not initially or only sparingly with information about the bridge.

- Advertisement -

El Kaouakibi without a party feels like a victim of settlement

There was a lack of clarity about the scope of the measure – ‘inactive’. Suspended as a party member does not mean that she will be temporarily expelled from the party. This morning the statutory committee came with more explanation. A suspended member cannot participate in board elections or compete as a candidate for a mandate.

Article link

The suspension meanwhile does not affect the political mandate. That is also impossible, a mandate belongs to the individual and not the party. Article link

The statutory committee further emphasizes that the suspended mandatory must ‘comply with the agreements and positions of Open VLD’. As a result, El Kaouakibi will remain a member of the group and dissenting voting behavior will not be tolerated.

Article link

The suspension will last until mid-August. Last week, El Kaouakibi announced that she agreed with the measure. Article link

The term can be extended / shortened depending on whether there is more clarity about the entire file.


Yesterday, the politician replied with his own audit of the LGU accounts, led by former SP.A politician Johan Vande Lanotte. Contrary to a previous audit, this showed that there was no personal enrichment or incorrect diversion of subsidies to its own companies. On the other hand, the bookkeeping turned out to be a mess and the internal relationship between the staff was lost. Her lawyers filed a complaint against an employee and objected to the appointment of a provisional administrator. Article link

The court is also continuing its investigation.

Important Alert

Dear reader.
I hope you are in health and well.
I offer you important instructions regarding this article

  • We only want readers to access information quickly and easily using other multilingual content, rather than information only available in a specific language.
  • We always respect the copyright of the author's content and always include
    the original link of the Source Article , and if the author does not agree, leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the author's request. Thank you so much! Warm greetings!


Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments