Bart De Pauw’s defense does not appeal to the court of Mechelen. Article link https://www.news1.news/news/2021/02/lawyers-bart-de-pauw-will-not-appeal-envelope-from-vr.html
The lawyers report this in a press release. Article link https://www.news1.news/news/2021/02/lawyers-bart-de-pauw-will-not-appeal-envelope-from-vr.html
The covers of the VRT, which contains the report of the prevention advisor, will therefore remain closed.
The court of Mechelen had already ruled on 11 February that Bart De Pauw and his lawyers were not entitled to the covers of the VRT, containing the notes of the prevention advisor of the VRT about her conversation with the actresses Maaike Cafmeyer and Liesa Naert, in to watch. In a press release, the defense now says that it will not appeal against that interlocutory judgment.
“We maintain in principle that the rights of defense in a criminal file require maximum transparency of all documents contained in it,” explains lawyer Michaël Verhaeghe. ‘But with many months of extra delay in the process, the De Pauw family is not served either.’
The defense believes that this will not weaken their file. “We have sufficient leads that allow us to reconstruct certain cases in the closed envelopes,” says lawyer John Maes. ‘So we can also prepare our pleas well without those covers.’
Now that this issue has been resolved, the process calendar can be determined at the February 25 session.
Importance of the cover
It is very doubtful whether the content of the covers would reveal anything new. According to the women’s lawyers, the actresses later stated just the same to the investigating judge. De Pauw has been able to look at those statements.
Nevertheless, the defense hoped to be able to find out the exact wording of Naert and Cafmeyer. Article link https://www.news1.news/news/2021/02/lawyers-bart-de-pauw-will-not-appeal-envelope-from-vr.html
The content of it was the reason for the VRT to terminate the long-term contract with Koeken Troef, the production house of De Pauw. That could possibly come in handy in the civil lawsuit that De Pauw himself filed against the VRT. De Pauw and his family are claiming damages of 12 million euros, because they believe the cooperation was unfairly terminated.
In a statement, the women, who accuse Bart De Pauw of, among other things, stalking, had already indicated that they had no problem with the opening. But according to their lawyer, Christine Mussche, the disclosure would undermine the professional secrecy of the prevention adviser.
I hope you are in health and well.
I offer you important instructions regarding this article
- The article has been translated based on the content of the Source link below these instructions
If there is any problem related to the content, copyright, correctness of the information contained in this article, or If there are errors in the language, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
- We only want readers to access information quickly and easily using other multilingual content, rather than information only available in a specific language.
- We always respect the copyright of the author's content and always include
the original link of the Source Article , and if the author does not agree, leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the author's request. Thank you so much! Warm greetings!