Transparency, only 5 Italian MEPs declare meetings with lobbies in the EU: our politicians at the bottom of the transparency ranking


The Italian MEPs are among the less transparent of allEuropean Union when it comes to claiming to have entertained relations with lobbyists. He reports it Transparency International publishing an update of the data collection platform Integrity Watch which is responsible for monitoring the activity of the lobbies in the corridors of the European institutions. Only five Italian members of the plenary posted online the report of at least one meeting with ong, interest representatives or companies in the current legislature: a very low percentage, the 6.6%, which places Italy in the lower parts of the ranking among Member States, followed only by Bulgaria (5.9%), Greece (4.8%) Cyprus is Croatia (0%). Percentages very different from those of the countries with the highest number of reports: the Sweden (90%), the Luxembourg (83%), the Finland (71%), i Netherlands (65%) and the Denmark (64%).

The Italian representatives who have certified at least one meeting are Irene Tinagli of the group of Socialists and Democrats e Marco Zanni, Andrea Caroppo, Marco Dreosto is Rosanna Conte of the Identity and Democracy group. A procedure, this, foreseen by the new regulation of the EU Parliament adopted in January 2019 precisely with the aim of making the institutions of Brussels more transparent: the presidents of the parliamentary committees, the rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs should publish all the meetings related to the reports in discussion in committees on an internal system in Parliament, while MEPs may also decide to make them public on their web page.

But if you look at the whole plenary, the percentages of those who provided this information remain low: they are 259 out of 704 the MEPs who made public 8,310 meetings, just over a third. As for the committee chairs, only 16 out of 22 published meetings with lobbyists. For members of Parliament who do not hold positions, however, the publication of the meetings remains voluntary.

Among the groups most attentive to transparency are i Verdi Efa (91%) e Renew Europe (57%), with over half of its members having published meetings with lobbies in the past year. Following the group S & D (45%), the left EU GUE / NGL (38%), the EPP (23%), Ecr (17.7%). The members of the group Identity and Democracy they publish least of all (8%).

Among the lobbyists, companies and NGOs that have invested the most in Lobby activities are the UniĆ²n General De Trabajadores De Las Comunicaciones Spanish, with over 20 million euros. They follow him European Chemical Industry Council with 10.5 million, I.R.I.S Solutions & Experts with 10, Sintes Af with 8.5, Pillar Project Worldwide Ltd with 8.3 e Google with 8.

The country from which the largest number of lobbyists come is the Belgium, but in this case it is also influenced by the fact that most of the work of the European institutions takes place in Brussels. In fact, all of these do not refer to Belgian companies. They follow the Germany, the France, the UK, the Spain and theItaly. Most of them (6,261) are companies, followed by NGOs (3,152) and think tanks (895).

Support never like now
we need you.

In these weeks of pandemic we journalists, if we do our job with conscience,
we do a public service. This is also why we are proud every day here at
to offer hundreds of new content for free to all citizens: news, exclusive insights,
expert interviews, surveys, videos and much more. All this work, however, has a great economic cost.
Advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues.
Not in line with the access boom. This is why I ask those who read these lines to support us.
To give us a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week,
fundamental for our work.
Become a supporting user by clicking here.

Thank you
Peter Gomez

But now we are the ones who need you.
Because our work has a cost.
We are proud to be able to offer hundreds of new content every day for free to all citizens.
But advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues.
Not in line with the boom in access to
This is why I ask you to support us, with a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week.
A small but fundamental sum for our work. Help us out!
Become a supporting user!

With gratitude
Peter Gomez

Support now

Payments available

Previous article

Mes, the specter of “stigma” and the risk that a rate hike will cancel the benefits: because no EU country has yet asked for that loan


Next article

Broadband, legal battle between Tim and Open Fiber: cross-claim for abuse of dominant position and unfair competition


Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here