The Prosecutor’s Office warns the accused that it is not an unlimited right, so their action is subject to judicial control
The TSJC judges the Parliamentary Table chaired by Carme Forcadell for disobedience
After the trial against the pro-independence political and civil leaders in the Supreme and against the cupola of the Mossos d’Esquadra in the National audience, he Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) today hosted the first session of the third trial by the procs, which affects the secessionist members of the Bureau of Parliament in the stage that was chaired by Carme Forcadell (2015-2017).
Accused of disobedience, they sit on the bench Blueberry, Guinea Blue, Anna Sim y Ramona Barrufet, all of them deputies from Together for the S [thecoalitioncreatedby[lacoalicincreadaporDemocratic Convergence and Republican Left for the elections that Artur Mas raised as an independence plebiscite in 2015]. To the four members of the governing body of the Catalan Parliament in the last legislature, they are accompanied Mireia Boya, then deputy and president of the group of the CUP in the Chamber.
All five face a request from the fiscal up to one year and eight months of disqualification and a fine of 30,000 euros for serious disobedience, having allowed resolutions in favor of the independence process to be debated in the Catalan legislative assembly, despite the fact that the constitutional Court He had warned them of his obligation to prevent it.
Two of the most remembered sessions of that convulsive legislature, which ended with the declaration of independence and the dissolution of the Parliament through article 155, were those of September 6 and 7, 2017, when the so-called laws of disconnect: that of the referendum of October 1 and that of legal and foundational transience of the Catalan Republic, later suspended by the TC.
Precisely, the former deputy Boya -who has answered the prosecutor’s questions in Arans [la variedad de la lengua occitana que se habla en el Valle de Arn] and with a translation into Catalan- it was imputed by the Supreme Court for having presented as president of its parliamentary group the proposal of the law that created an alternative legal framework to Spanish in the event that the s to independence he would win the referendum.
Parliamentary inviolability has been the axis of the script with which the defenses of the accused have argued that the pro-independence members of the Mesa did not disobey the orders of the TC during his mandate. The lawyer Judit Gen, who defends Corominas, Barrufet and Guin (the three of the PDeCAT), has argued that the accused limited themselves to guaranteeing the freedom of expression of all the deputies, as well as the parliamentary autonomy and the separation of powers.
By contrast, the Prosecutor’s Office has warned that this supposed inviolability is not an unlimited right, since it protects them for the exercise of parliamentary action, but must not be transgressed or used against the rights of other deputies or a part of the citizen, reason why its action is susceptible to judicial control.
This cause was taken up by the TSJC after the Supreme Court decided to separate it from the one that ended, last October, with the conviction of Forcadell. The trial will continue this Wednesday with the statement of several witnesses and will be seen for sentencing on Friday after the final reports and conclusions.
According to the criteria of