The path of the Simplifications decree, expected in cabinet by the end of the week, it already finds a first obstacle. After the publication of the first draft of the text, the premier Giuseppe Conte convened for today at 18 i Heads of Delegation of the majority forces. The decree and therefore also article 10 will be discussed: it provides that building abuse who have not led to an increase in the urban load are punished only with one sanction administrative and that the violation is prescribed in ten years. In addition there is the proposal, still under discussion, to allow the assessment of compliance even for buildings that they were not compliant on the regulatory plan at the time of implementation: a similar regulation of the Sicily Region was rejected by the Consulta in 2017.
On the norm, the first divisions emerge even within the same government: “The amnesties are not eligible, are the result of an old policy and do not solve problems, indeed they cause more. I will never say yes to a amnesty “, is the comment released to The print from environment Minister pentastellato, Sergio Costa. In the dicastery the no to the norm is bipartisan, as the words of the undersecretary and deputy Pd demonstrate Roberto Morassut: “It’s time for Green New Deal, not of amnesties. In the connected environment there will be concrete measures to stop the soil consumption“.
In fact, according to Morassut it is “a norm”kill the ground“” Which is “in total contrast to this government’s stated goal of limiting land use and pursuing the zero balance goal by 2050“. “In the discussion on the first draft of the revival decree – reads the note of the undersecretary – I had already raised the problem of the rule on ‘amnesty’ surreptitious. The norm was fortunately shelved but now yes reoccur in the simplification decree “.
“With that rule – continues Morassut – it will be possible extend (in fact without limit) the implementation plans up to and including illegal properties making re-enter in urban planning. And this will result not only in a de facto building amnesty but in the transformation of new agricultural land or inedited in potentially building land. I’d like to report the inappropriateness and the serious contradiction of a similar measure, very insidious. I think it should be removed”, Writes the Democratic deputy.
The text of article 10 was criticized yesterday by Leu, according to which it has all the air of yet another amnesty“. For the Green coordinator Angelo Bonelli “it’s a clever and scandalous norm“. For the most part, for now few have exposed themselves but certainly no satisfaction has arrived. And in the meantime the criticisms of the labor unions: Cigl, Cisl and Uil ask for a confrontation at Palazzo Chigi.
Support ilfattoquotidiano.it: never like now we need you.
In these weeks of pandemic we journalists, if we do our job with conscience, we do a public service. This is also why we are proud every day here at ilfattoquotidiano.it to offer hundreds of new content for free to all citizens: news, exclusive insights, expert interviews, surveys, videos and much more. All this work, however, has a great economic cost. Advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues. Not in line with the access boom. This is why I ask those who read these lines to support us. To give us a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week, fundamental for our work. Become a supporting user by clicking here.
Thank you Peter Gomez
THANK YOU FOR READING ALREADY XX ITEMS THIS MONTH.
But now we are the ones who need you. Because our work has a cost. We are proud to be able to offer hundreds of new content every day for free to all citizens. But advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues. Not in line with the boom in access to ilfattoquotidiano.it. This is why I ask you to support us, with a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week. A small but fundamental sum for our work. Help us out! Become a supporting user!