Montanelli is a morally questionable man, but destroying his statue is not rational


An iconoclastic fury is pervading not only the United States of America but also Europe and Italy. The statues are destroyed as symbols of a racist power or of individual behaviors that we don’t like very much. In England slavers of the eighteenth century they are thrown to the ground in their representations, as is the case for the southern generals of the United States or for other symbols a little further away in time.

For example Christopher Columbus. Of course he was a slave driver, of course he was even the initiator of the torments of some peoples, but at very different times. We will have to do the same with Hernán Cortés and above all with Pizarro, that is, with those who from Spain they basically subjugated a continent and destroyed the indigenous ethnic groups.

But in Italy instead we go back to Montanelli. Indro Montanelli he was a man from a past truly execrable from a moral point of view, for the issues of his racism, his adherence to a totalitarian fascist ideology and also for his relationship with a minor girl. All this, in my view, was not to be celebrated with a statue. But all this cannot, however, always, in my view, involve destruction of the statue.
Among other things, I believe that Montanelli would have been happy in life to see her sprayed with red or smeared, because he was a character outside of this type of considerations.

On the other hand, if we were to see it all, one of all comes to mind Vasilij Kandiskij who almost at the end of his life marries a girl who was perhaps not even 15 years old. When we look at the past we cannot judge it with the meter of the present otherwise we should not have statues with the Roman emperors, especially of the most bloodthirsty. But maybe not even celebrate Socrates, Plato, Aristotle that everyone thought slavery was completely natural. Yet they were men too.

I mean that if we want to review history, in a great revisionist process, perhaps we can review the one closest to us. Because it seems impossible to us that in 1800 someone could think of slavery as a normal fact. But the more distant one is difficult to judge. Two thousand years ago things went differently. It is a delicate matter, it is not perhaps the most important, but it is very significant.

GeoMario, things of this world – With Mario Tozzi


Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here