France under investigation for pandemic management


An investigation into how the crisis of the coronavirus epidemic was managed, with the hypothesis of a crime for the highest political and administrative authorities of “manslaughter”, “omission of relief” and “procured risk to citizens”: after Around 40 complaints filed during the lockdown, Paris prosecutor Remy Heitz decided to break the delay and announced that a preliminary investigation would be launched.

To report the French authorities were relatives of victims, professional organizations or ordinary citizens who filled out the pre-printed complaints and disseminated on websites.

All those who managed the emergency firsthand are in the target of the complaints and the investigation, starting with the omnipresent Director General of Health, Jerome Salomon, who entered the houses of the French every night for almost 3 months with recommendations, figures and budgets. Sometimes conflicting with each other, such as when – at the beginning – it was not considered essential to wear masks (also because France had very few) while over the days the delivery became mandatory.

Among the reported, also public health as a whole, the prison administration and the Ministry of Labor. In all, the preliminary investigation responds to 13 procedures for as many complaints and to a 14 / a action that includes 33 complaints from private individuals.

It does not include all the numerous actions taken regarding the management of retirement homes. The Parisian judiciary will have to deal with burning issues in recent weeks, such as the availability of masks or the protective measures adopted in the workplace.

The unpreparedness, the lack of prevention capacities of the current government are called into question in the various judicial actions, with the natural exception of the head of state, who is irresponsible under the law by law, and members of the government, who will eventually have to answer to the Court of Justice of the Republic. Eighty complaints against ministers have already been received by the latter body.

“The criminal investigation should not define political or administrative responsibilities, but highlight any criminal offenses – clarified the prosecutor Heitz – if there are criminal offenses, they will most likely be unintentional. And the law establishes precise conditions for establishing these crimes: it requires proof of “qualified guilt” which is not a simple imprudence or negligence “.

© – Reproduction reserved

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here