A fear winds between the savers. The fear of a new forced withdrawal on liquidity, as happened from the evening to the following morning on 9 July 1992. An event well present in the collective memory of the Italians, which also worries many who personally did not suffer him. The surge in public debt, especially for the coronavirus, makes many savers fear an imperative intervention on the liquidity they have on accounts and passbooks, bank or postal. I have also confirmed this by the numerous e-mails I receive about it.
In reality right now the risk of a reissue of the intervention of Giuliano Amato, the then head of government, is practically nil in particular for the following reasons.
1. Until there is one in Italy dictatorship, which fortunately is not on the horizon, a forced withdrawal on the accounts requires a parliamentary majority to approve it. This majority in 1992 was there, now it is not seen at all;
2. A withdrawal in the order of 0.6% it would bring less than 10 billion into state coffers. In any case too few for the political consequences of such a measure. The final balance would obviously change with one patrimonial generalized, that is, not limited to current accounts and other deposits, much more defensible in terms of equity and constitutionality. But it would be another matter.
Why then is there so much talk about a withdrawal from checking accounts? Because many, often in bad faith, present it instead as likely or even certain. Their real goal is to trim more easily financial products and expensive and risky social security.
aside class=”wrapper-custom-correlato full-correlato”>
div class=”image”><img class=”lazyload” src=”https://st.ilfattoquotidiano.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/13/bancomat-1350-320×132.jpg” alt=”Banks, “here’s how to choose the account, protect savings and not fall into the traps of finance””/>
Banks, “here’s how to choose the account, protect savings and not fall into the traps of finance”
An attack has been underway for some years, even in the media, against the money conservatively kept on checking accounts. The self-styled bank advisors tell customers all sorts of lies. In addition to the bogeyman of the estate, they shake that of the bail-in, that is, of bankruptcy, even for very solid banks. They then spread tarot data, to convince them of significant losses in purchasing power, when currently theinflation it is completely negligible.
Similar speeches are carried out by most economic journalism, subservient to the interests of the financial establishment. All of them are doing their utmost to convince savers to take the different ones on the rump traps designed to scrape away money: mutual funds, life insurance policies, pension plans, certificates, etc.
In this way they are “lightened” by something like 2% per year, as shown by various researches on the costs of managed savings. It is roughly triple the 0.6% of the Amato government levy and above all they suffer it every year and not lump sum.
A final element demonstrates bad faith or, in the best case, theincompetence of many who pretend to be so-called financial advisors or boast of doing financial education. The only perfect solution and, moreover, without costs to avoid an asset tax on liquidity, is to withdraw from the account and keep the savings in cash. This solution is never even mentioned.
Support ilfattoquotidiano.it: never like now
<b>we need you</b>.
In these weeks of pandemic we journalists, if we do our job with conscience,
we do a public service. This is also why we are proud every day here at ilfattoquotidiano.it
to offer hundreds of new content for free to all citizens: news, exclusive insights,
expert interviews, surveys, videos and much more. All this work, however, has a great economic cost.
Advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues.
Not in line with the access boom. This is why I ask those who read these lines to support us.
To give us a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week,
fundamental for our work. <br/>Become a supporting user by clicking here.
<span class="sign-gomez">Peter Gomez</span>
<h3 class="hidden">THANK YOU FOR READING ALREADY <span id="article-ifq-bottom-count">XX</span> ITEMS THIS MONTH.<h3>
But now we are the ones who need you.
Because our work has a cost.
We are proud to be able to offer hundreds of new content every day for free to all citizens.
But advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues.
Not in line with the boom in access to ilfattoquotidiano.it.
This is why I ask you to support us, with a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week.
A small but fundamental sum for our work. Help us out! <br/>Become a supporting user!
<span class="sign-gomez">Peter Gomez</span>
<a class="logo-ifq no-hover">
<img class="lazyload" src="https://st.ilfattoquotidiano.it/wp-content/themes/ifq-2019/assets/img/svg/logo-desktop.svg" alt="ilFattoquotidiano.it "width =" 120"/>
<a class="btn" href="https://shop.ilfattoquotidiano.it/abbonati-ora/?product_id=256541&utm_source=ilfattoquotidiano.it&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=sostenitore&utm_content=base-1-0-ANNUALE-yellow" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
<img class="lazyload" src="https://st.ilfattoquotidiano.it/wp-content/plugins/ifq-solicit/assets/carte-bottom.png" alt="Available payments "width =" 242"/>
<section class="article-nav blog">
<a href="https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2020/06/10/made-in-italy-il-sistema-manifatturiero-e-di-nuovo-in-crisi-ora-occorre-creativita/5829142/" class="link-article link-article-prev">
<h5 class="prev-article">Previous article</h5>
<h3>Made in Italy, the manufacturing system is again in crisis. Now creativity is needed</h3>
<span class="article-nav-prev abs-right cc"><img src="https://st.ilfattoquotidiano.it/wp-content/themes/ifq-2019/assets/img/svg/arrow-big.svg" alt="next"/></span>
Source link https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2020/06/11/prelievo-forzoso-sui-conti-correnti-oggi-il-rischio-e-nullo-ma-ce-di-peggio/5830266/