EU Parliament against Czech Prime Minister Babis: “The reopening of investigations into the improper use of EU funds” for the company of which he is the founder is doing well. And criticizes the Commission: “The verification system is opaque”


It is a very tough stance that of EU Parliament towards the Czech Prime Minister, Andrej Babiš, accused of misuse of EU funding, he was born in EU control system on the redistribution of structural funds in the various Member States. It can be read in the resolution approved Friday a large majority from the Brussels plenary, with 510 votes in favor, 53 against (including Brothers of Italy) and 101 abstentions (including the League). A text that has found the transversal support of the classroom, even from a part of Renew Europe of which the formation of the premier, Year 2011, is part of, even if the country is part of the sovereign blockade of Visegrád.

The text concerns the “reopening of the investigations against the Czech Prime Minister on the misuse of EU funds and potential conflicts of interest“. A matter that dates back to 2018, when it emerged that the agri-food giant Agrofert, of which Babiš is the founder, had received million euros of funds intended for the agri-food sector. Over the years, the story has rebounded on the benches of the various European bodies, also characterized by serious episodes, such as threats reported by EU delegation come to Prague in February 2020 to carry out checks on the redistribution of funds.

Babiš in the best case, European forces say, is in a situation of full conflict of interest since, as prime minister, “he is actively involved in the implementation of the EU budget in Czech Republic, while still controlling the Agrofert group as founder and sole beneficiary of two trusts“. Parliament, therefore, “welcomes the reopening of the criminal investigation which concerns the Czech Prime Minister for his involvement in the project ‘Stork’s Nest’ (Capi Hnizdo, a conference center owned by one of the companies of the Agrofert group since 2007 and on which the Czech authorities are investigating to determine whether the 2 million EU funds received have been obtained improperly, ed) “And” is confident that the Czech judiciary will proceed independently and without any possible political influence “.

The problem, MEPs stress, however, is not only the management of the Babiš affair, which is anything but willing to give up the funds for the company he founded, but also and above all the inefficiency of the control bodies on management and redistribution. At the national level, the classroom underlines that “serious deficiencies in management and control systems in the area of ​​regional and cohesion funds in the Czech Republic” have been identified and expresses concern that the Court of Auditors country cannot regularly check the correctness of public expenditure at “regional and local” level. Without forgetting that the advice of the State fund for agricultural interventions has one politically unbalanced composition.

But the shortcomings also exist and especially at European level. It is no coincidence that the members of the plenary ask the EU Commission to create a control mechanism that “actively” avoids conflicts of interest, even “identifying the final beneficiaries of EU aid “, as well as” zero tolerance “towards offenders.

Furthermore, Parliament “strongly disapproves” of the creation of “oligarchic structures which draw on EU agricultural and cohesion funds “and then stresses that, at central level in Brussels, the system of distribution and verification of EU funds is “Opaque and complex”, so much so that “the European Commission is unable to provide Parliament with a precise picture when asked about certain payments in different Member States”. In particular, “no regulation on the use of agricultural and cohesion funds” imposes the obligation to publish the “ultimate beneficiary” of a company or entity that obtains the funds.

MEPs “insist that a conflict of interest at the highest level of the government of a Member State, if confirmed, cannot be tolerated and must be resolved by the people involved”, or by taking measures such that they no longer have economic interests in the company, or avoiding that the company receives “any funding from EU funds, public subsidies or funds distributed by the national government”.

But there is another aspect that worries the Brussels parliamentarians, that is clash between the delegation of parliamentarians who went to the Czech Republic at the end of February to carry out checks and examine the use of EU funds by the country and the Prime Minister himself, as part of the new investigation opened in October 2019 by the Eurocamera and the budget control commission. The group, made up of six members of the commission and chaired by the German MEP Monika Hohlmeier, as soon as he arrived he had a very hard argument with the Prime Minister. An exchange of accusations that then also moved to the press. “Just arrived – says a source close to the delegation a – Babiš has defined us traitors is crazy people, remembering that i 30 thousand euros shipping costs were European citizens’ money. ”

Hohlmeier then explained to the premier that this was the maximum amount made available, but that she herself had arrived in Prague from Germany with his car. And, sources said, he then counterattacked: “Can you boast of our own transparency?”. Back in Brussels, then, the deputies reported on “Words of hate” by the prime minister, so much so that one of the members of the delegation turned to the police. “We strongly condemn the public use of defamatory language and hatred towards the participants in the mission by the Prime Minister – concludes the resolution of the Parliament – We find it unacceptable that the members of Parliament who took part in the mission of the Budgetary Control Committee in the Czech Republic have received death threats and other verbal attacks while doing their job. ”

Twitter: @GianniRosini

Support never like now
we need you.

In these weeks of pandemic we journalists, if we do our job with conscience,
we do a public service. This is also why we are proud every day here at
to offer hundreds of new content for free to all citizens: news, exclusive insights,
expert interviews, surveys, videos and much more. All this work, however, has a great economic cost.
Advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues.
Not in line with the access boom. This is why I ask those who read these lines to support us.
To give us a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week,
fundamental for our work.
Become a supporting user by clicking here.

Peter Gomez

But now we are the ones who need you.
Because our work has a cost.
We are proud to be able to offer hundreds of new content every day for free to all citizens.
But advertising, in a time when the economy is stagnant, offers limited revenues.
Not in line with the boom in access to
This is why I ask you to support us, with a minimum contribution, equal to the price of a cappuccino per week.
A small but fundamental sum for our work. Help us out!
Become a supporting user!

With gratitude
Peter Gomez

Support now

Payments available

Previous article

George Floyd, EU Parliament condemns racism and supports Black Lives Matter: Lega and FdI vote against the resolution


Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here