Then, the denial of Van Kerkhove: it was a misunderstanding and “the estimates of the transmission from people without symptoms come mainly from models that may not provide an accurate representation. This is, and remains, a great unknown”. Already. but then why communicate to half the world, without any evidence and indeed in the presence of contrary evidence, that asymptomatic are not contagious? A fool that is difficult to justify with the embarrassed comment of Ranieri Guerra, the Italian deputy director of the WHO who, in an interview with “Radio one day for day”, lets himself go to a diplomat “We – we must admit – do not we are communication phenomena, we often express ourselves in an unclear technical or technical way “. In reality, the WHO has been accused from the beginning of having handled the Coronavirus problem badly, of having declared the pandemic too late, of having exposed itself in favor of China, of having given contradictory and unclear information, at best misleading hypotheses .READ also: Hydroxychloroquine, so scientific journals and WHO have lost credibility
And this latest release has certainly not helped to cheer up the spirits. Andrea Crisanti, director of the Department of Molecular Medicine and Virology at the University of Padua, asks to define the role of the WHO which – on 24 morning microphones on Radio 24 – defines “a slum that must be dismantled and remade from scratch because it is financed in large part from private industries and a few states and instead it should do the interests of the world community. ” And it talks about “inaccurate and wrong” answer about asymptomatics that don’t transmit the new coronavirus too Walter Ricciardi, Italian representative to the WHO and adviser to the Minister of Health, Speranza: “The transmission from asymptomatic – he specified to Agorà on Rai 3 – is, on the other hand, typical of this virus and this is what differentiates it from Sars and Mers. WHO, however, must be criticized but supported “. And he talks about statements “as daring as dangerous” Nino Cartabellotta, president of the Gimbe Foundation, who recalls how the best available evidence on asymptomatic infection was published in the early days of Daniele Horan and Eric Topol on Annals of internal medicine. In short, it was enough to read them. Even clearer Giuseppe Ippolito, scientific director of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani in Rome who, during a hearing in the Chamber’s Social Affairs Commission, defined the WHO “as in previous experiences, not precise, not indicative and, above all, without a solid clinical basis “.
The Diamond Princess
Get even more on the merits, explaining well to Timeline on SkyTg24 Franco Locatelli, president of the Superior Health Council and member of the Technical Scientific Committee for the coronavirus emergency. “The so-called asymptomatic can be pre-symptomatic and paucisymptomatic in one phase before developing symptoms. Then there are the actual asymptomatic. We have scientific publications that document how even an asymptomatic can have significantly high viral load” and therefore “the subjects asymptomatic have the ability to infect. ” It is obvious and intuitive that the viral load is higher in those who have the symptoms “and therefore has a greater ability to transmit the infection – added Locatelli – but the case of the Diamond Princess shows that there has been a spread of the contagion also by asymptomatics “.
And from overseas too Anthony Fauci, the most well-known and criticized American virologist, admitted that the statement on asymptomatics is incorrect and that the WHO has retraced its steps because not only is there no evidence to support what has been stated by its representative. But – on the contrary – the evidence we have is that between 25 and 45 per cent of the total infected have no symptoms. And we know from epidemiological studies that these people can pass on coronavirus to healthy people, even if they don’t have symptoms. In short, the WHO has really hit.