PENSIONS FEE 100: GANGA (CISL), ‘IT MUST NOT BE DISCUSSED BEFORE DEADLINE’ – PENSION REFORM NEWS
Quote 100 Pensions “it was not a privilege but it represented an important opportunity that should not be questioned before its natural expiration. Now it is a question of structuring a stable measure that looks to the future without perpetrating further injustices on those who have endured the previous reforms retirement. ” Confederal secretary Ignazio Ganga declares it in a note. And he explains: “Precisely because savings have been generated from quota 100, it would be important to understand from the Government how the recent pension savings can be addressed in the negotiations that have just opened”. Ignazio Ganga underlines: “In the social security sector, the Government knows the proposals of the union that have been amply illustrated in the 4 meetings that have already taken place ”.
PENSIONS: PROIETTI (UIL), ‘FLEXIBILITY FOR 62 YEARS OF ACCESS IS DEFINED’ – PENSION REFORM NEWS
“The ongoing confrontation between government and unions must lead to the definition of a more widespread flexibility of access to pension around 62 years as it happens in the rest of Europe “, affirms Domenico Proietti, the confederal secretary of Uil.” To achieve this goal, together with all the other contents in the platform on the pension chapter, the government must post resources significantly greater than the savings obtained with quota 100“he observes.
PENSIONS QUOTA 100 SAVE: HERE IS THE SITUATION. Reform Pensions News
There pension reform it will be done, but the times are medium-long. Quote 100 pensions and the others pension advance measures currently in force obviously go ahead as expected. Throughout 2020 they do not touch each other. Then, depending on how the confrontation between government and unions will proceed, it will be seen. The fact remains that Quote 100 pensions in the current state of affairs it will continue throughout the expected trial period, i.e. until the end of 2021. But let’s see the situation: for now no hypotheses under study at the moment on pensions while the point on the resources available will be made on the eve of the political table convened in March, not earlier. It is the Minister of Labor, Nunzia Catalfo, to take stock of the government’s position regarding the pension reform, in discussion on the technical tables with the unions, and to clarify the indiscretions that are overlapping these days. “For the moment there are no hypotheses, we are listening to the social partners and we will study in recent months, based on the result that we will have from the burdensome commission and the connection on the separation between assistance and social security, the impact of the various proposals”, he says on the sidelines of an INAIL initiative. “We will find solutions for outgoing flexibility, discontinuous workers and youth guarantee pensions and non-self-sufficiency,” he adds. And as for resources, he continues, “we have a next table shortly on February 19, and we said to make a first point in late March and then arrive in September with a concrete proposal”. “It is obvious that all this is done with the resources that will then be allocated to budget law,” he explains
PENSIONS: ANIEF, REINTRODUCE QUOTA 96, WEARING WORK SCHOOL – PENSIOINI REFORM NEWS
“A technical study table was held at the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy reform of the pension system and specifically on the ‘flexibility in output‘with the participation of all confederal unions. Anief calls for the reintroduction of quota 96, the recognition of the arduous work for school staff, the service carried out in the national education system and the role passages, the end of the retention on TFR “. This is what is read in a note from the Anief. According to the note,” Confedir, represented by Stefano Cavallini, member of the national board of Anief, presented a detailed memorandum on the topic that recognizes the peculiarity of every professionalism in the public administration “.
Pensions Quota 100, it’s about penalties. Assumptions in the field – Pensions Reform news
PENSIONS QUOTE 100 REDUCED BY QUOTE 99? Reform Pensions News
100 PENSION FEE REPLACED BY 99 PENSION FEE? The proposal in recent days has been re-launched by the former Minister for Labor Cesare Damiano (PD) and aims to allow anleaving work at 63 years old (age that matches theSocial Bee). “That is, one could imagine a structural exit principle starting from 63 years with at least 35 years of contributions. Without excluding the possibility of bringing the requested contribution to 36 years. Such a mechanism would indeed allow for quota-based flexibility. We could establish, for example, that one can access retirement with 63 years and 36 of contributions, or with 64 and 35. In short, instead of Quote 100 we could talk about Quota 99, but that it is really a quota that allows a certain game both on age and on contributions. With flexibility up to 4 years, those approaching those thresholds of contributions and age could be led by the hand towards retirement and not be thrown into the abyss with a jump of 5 years once the Fornero criterion has been reintroduced “. The doubts about the 99 pensions share are linked to the costs that would affect the state with a reform of this type. The debate on post quota 100 pensions as it is more open than ever.
PENSIONS FEE 100 GOODBYE: FEE 102 OR IN PENSIONS AT 62 YEARS AND 20 OF CONTRIBUTIONS? Reform Pensions News
Quota 100 will be sent to retirement: there are those who say at the end of 2021 (i.e. at the end of the three-year period) and those who press to overcome it first. Certainly the world of politics and work are discussing how to overcome this form of (sooner or later) early retirement launched since Government League-M5S than predict i 62 years of age and 38 years of contributions. Two proposals for reform post Quote 100 Pensions on the Ministry of Labor table. The first, more governmental, has already been renamed Quote 102 since it provides a early retirement at 64 years of age with 38 years of contributions (precisely sum 102) but with pension payment only with the contribution method. Unions are betting on pension with 62 years of age and at least 20 years of contributions, but without penalties. Quote 102 Pensions would weigh relatively little on the INPS funds, the second would have an estimated cost of around 20 billion euros. The confrontation continues.
GUEST HOUSES: LANDINI, ‘SALVINI STOP POLICY PROPAGANDA, 41 YEARS IS OUR PROPOSAL – PENSION REFORM NEWS
” Salvini should stop making political propaganda because he was in government and the modification of Fornero did not make it and he did not even agree to open a negotiating table ”. This was stated by the secretary of the CGIL, Maurizio Landini, commending the proposal to retire after 41 years of work during the transmission of Rai tre Agorà. ” It is something that has been within the CGIL, CISL and UIL platform for 3 years and it is a request made to him too ” who, when he was in government, ” did not respond. He invented 100 for three years, which then disappears. ” When he was part of the executive, in Count One, “this union discussion didn’t make it”. “Today, however, the issue is there” “because” “this government has agreed to open the discussion”, notes the trade unionist. It’s my problem, it’s not what Salvini thinks, but bringing home the results and confronting the government that is there. If Salvini has decided to go to the opposition he has done everything, ” concludes Landini.
PENSIONS QUOTE 100 LIBERALIZED AND QUOTA 41 FOR ALL. Reform Pensions News
FEE 100 BOARDS? LIBERALIZED. YES AT ALTITUDE 41 AND THEN .. L’ughe said: “A full-fledged discussion is fine but the table must be unique as well as unitary, with all the social partners”. This is the request that the UGL delegation, made up of Deputy Secretary General Luca Malcotti and Confederal Secretary Fiovo Bitti, addressed to the Minister of Labor, Nunzia Catalfoduring the government-trade unions afternoon round on pension reform. The UGL also said “yes to the technical commissions proposed by the ministry, because an evaluation is necessary and useful, also through specific technical commissions, to be added to the two commissions established by the budget law, to which it is appropriate to ensure the maximum participation of all the social actors already present on the INPS steering and supervision board ”. At the heart of the Ugl platform “the purchasing power of pensions and a reflection on the post Quota 100 that could be” liberalized “or without any entry stake. But also the possibility of retirement with 41 years of contributions; the revision of the social Ape; the enhancement of maternity and unpaid care work for women’s pensions; the extension of the stalls for heavy and arduous works; the guarantee pension for young people ”.
PENSIONS QUOTE 100 EXCEEDED BY THE “THIRD WAY” OF BOERI. Reform Pensions News
FEE 100 BOARDS and the eternal dilemma: how to go further? “There is one third way between those who propose to cancel the Fornero law and the fully contributory recalculation “. The idea is offormer INPS president Tito Boeriaccording to here Quota 100 (which “increased inequalities between age and income classes” and “forced INPS to send inspectors around to check that people are not working, created huge holes in staff in school and health “.”) Could be overcome in a non-traumatic way. “It would be enough to avoid benefiting those who leave earlier than those who decide to wait: it would be a reasonable choice of equity as well as financial sustainability”. The idea is to lower the pension by about 1.5% for each year earlier than 67 years and at least 20 years of contributions, currently foreseen by the Fornero reform, which has raised the retirement age and introduced several penalties on the early pensions. Boeri goes even further and proposes to reduce the contribution charges for young people, “as was done in 2015 with the decontribution”. In short, out of quota 100 pensions without damages. The debate is open.
PENSIONS, AT 62 YEARS? ITALIANS BREAK UP ON REFORM. Pensions News
“The unions propose to retire at 62 with 20 years of contributions, but for the government it would cost 20 billion. Is it worth it? ”. According to a EMG Water survey presented on Friday 24 January ad Agora, the program conducted by Serena Bortone on Raitre, 39% are in favor of pension to 62 years with 20 contributions and as many opposites. 22% prefer not to answer.
PENSIONS QUOTE 100 TRANSFORMED IN QUOTA 99. Pensions Reform News
Quote 100 Pensions and then? How to overcome this form of early retirement at the end of the three-year trial period (or earlier? Who knows). Francesca Puglisi, Undersecretary to the Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, has made an interesting proposal that will surely open a debate. Switch FEE 100 TO FEE 99 BOARDS. Like? “Going out at 64 and 35 years of contributions, without penalties. One year more contributions to mothers for each child. A guarantee pension of up to € 750 per month for young people to supplement the contributions paid, provided they have at least 20 years of contributions, “he explained. In short: 64 years (against 62 of 100) and 35 years of contributions (against 38 of 100) without penalties on the pension calculation (who has shares of payments that can be valued with the salary would keep them). On January 27th there will be a meeting between the government and the unions and the debate on 100 PENSION FEE AND … AROUND (let’s not forget MOTHER FEE, see below) will go live.
PENSIONS QUOTA 100 AND NOT ONLY: GOVERNMENT THINKS ABOUT ‘MOTHER QUOTA’. Reform Pensions News
Pensions reform, you don’t just think about the future of or post quota 100. Mara Carfagna he explains: “If the statements of the Undersecretary for Labor Francesca Puglisi were confirmed, the government would be imagining to take on board the proposal that we have made with ‘Free Voice’ and that we have called ‘Quote mom“” What is it? It is said quickly: “One one year pension discount to every woman for every child she has. It is a measure that we have presented several times, currently also as an amendment to the Milleproroghe: it is there, available, if the majority decides to vote with us, we would be delighted. We are not jealous if the good measures for the benefit of the citizens become everyone’s, but if the words of the undersecretary should not follow the facts, then we would denounce yet another useless proof of propaganda as an end in itself “, the words of the Vice-President of the Chamber and deputy of Forza Italia reported by Dire.
PENSIONS QUOTE 100 TREASURE, CATALF: “SAVE MONEY? STAY TO SOCIAL SECURITY” – PENSION REFORM NEWS
The savings of share 100 pensions? “I hope they will stay with the pension fund to use them for the next opportune proposals”, explains the Minister of Labor Nunzia Catalfo. The assumptions for the flexibility in output, tothe expiry of the three-year plan introduced by the League in the previous government, “we are setting up a commission of experts to evaluate all possible forms,” he says reaffirming that quota 100 ” will last the years for which it is foreseen ”, until the end of 2021. ” If you do not make assessments on the impact at the stalls level and the economic effects before, it is needless to say first what form of flexibility in exit ” take, he says, insisting that ” to say them first makes no sense or I would not have done three commissions and a comparison table ”. Finally, as for this week’s pension table, Catalfo explains that there will be no talk of minimum wages.
PENSIONS FEE 100 AND THEN? TRIDICO POINTS ON FLEXIBILITY. FORNERO: “WOULD CREATE NEW POOR” – PENSION REFORM NEWS
“I don’t think it’s an appropriate and politically feasible measure. And the risk is that such a proposal could induce people in more difficult conditions to leave work, creating new poor people. Because what today can be considered a just adequate pension, tomorrow will prove to be a low pension. ” So the former Minister of Labor, Elsa Fornero, comments, in conversation with Adnkronos, the opening of the president of the INPS Pasquale Tridico to a pension flexibility that allows him to voluntarily quit the job before the current 67 years but subjecting the whole contribution recalculation check. “From a financial point of view, this proposal, obviously, given that it opts for a fully contributory calculation, does not impose charges on the community in the sense that everyone takes the pension that has been paid with their own contributions but it is clear, however, that it would entail much lower pensions than what workers expect “, comments Fornero again explaining how the proposal translates into a sort of”Option woman“generalized to those over the age of 58 who are required to leave women early today. “Offering this possibility of early retirement to all workers would certainly mean lowering the level of pensions because it would mean recalculating all pensions from the beginning of one’s working career, with therefore very strong reductions in checks to come. The risk is therefore that this proposal may induce people in more difficult conditions to go out, creating new poor people. Because what can now be considered a just adequate pension will prove to be a low pension tomorrow “, warns Fornero, confident also of the fact that” none of those who are in government today or support it has in mind an idea entirely based on contributions “. Fornero, the road to take to relaunch the country and increase the purchasing power of workers, however, is different and does not include further changes to the social security system. “We should always stop thinking about anticipating generalized retirements and instead we should focus more on how to encourage the work of all the people who can do it, whether they are young people, today precarious, or women, always considered in the background, or even men no longer young but who still have the ability to work, “he concludes.
Pensions Share 100 Landini goes further: “Retired at 62” – Pensions Reform News
PENSIONS FEE 100 … AND THEN? PROIETTI (UIL), ‘NO TRIDIC PROPOSAL, CONTRIBUTIVE SIZE RECALCULATION’ – PENSION REFORM NEWS
“If the Tridico proposal means a contributory recalculation of the allowance it is not a good thing; it would only lead to a cut in pensions. And this is far from our requests. For us, flexibility must be widespread and diversified around 62 years, as is the case throughout Europe, but without any contribution recalculation because it would unacceptably weaken the pension allowance “. It is Domenico Proietti, confederal secretary Uil to comment in this way, in conversation with the Adnkronos, the idea of the INPS president, Pasquale Tridico which opens to a flexibility in leaving work, compared to the 67 years currently required to retire old age, but with a ‘contributory’ recalculation of the check. However, the pension theme will shortly be on the table of discussion with the government, on 27 January next, from which the union expects a wide-ranging discussion that also includes heavy work, women and early workers. “We must then think of young people, their future pension which will register large contributory holes due to the precariousness of the work they are victims of: we think we can build a figurative contribution system or criteria with which to define a sort of guarantee pension”, continues Proietti also remembering the need to recognize heavy work as that of care carried out by women and also solve the problem of early workers to whom retirement with 41 years of contribution should be allowed.
PENSIONS QUOTE 100 GOODBYE, MATTEO SALVINI PREPARES THE BARRICATES. Reform Pensions News
QUOTE 100 Pensions exceeded in the medium term by Quote 102 (or Quota 101, the open political debate)? Matteo Salvini isn’t there. The formula of early retirement (62 years – against the 64 that we are talking about in the past weeks for the future – and 38 in contributions) which was launched by the Lega-M5S government and so dear to the Carroccio is defended by the number one League. Announcing: “The Democratic Party has presented a bill to exceed 100 and raise the retirement age: cursed! Other than ‘Bella ciao’, they want to keep people hostage up to 70 years of age, but if they try we will make them sing it in Parliament day and night Bella ciao and we will not let them leave Parliament ”, Salvini’s words – as reported by thermometer. it – during a meeting in Novellara in the province of Reggio Emilia.
Pensions Share 100. Balboni (FdI): inadmissible delays on severance pay for civil servants – pension reform news
“The government stipulates the framework agreement with banks and financial intermediaries, foreseen by the decree law establishing Quote 100, to allow the disbursement of the good exit, for a maximum value of 45 thousand euros, for those civil servants who have decided to retire through Quota 100. A paradoxical and inadmissible situation that penalizes employees twice, who in addition to not enjoying the legitimate good exit are also forced to see the liquidation times of the end of service treatment extended “, the words of the Senator of Fratelli d’Italia, Alberto Balboni, vice president of the Justice Commission, who presented a question regarding the Minister of Labor and Economy. “A dutiful intervention by the government also in light of the Constitutional Court ruling, which invites Parliament to urgently redefine the whole matter because the uncertainty of a just and timely remuneration is in contrast with the constitutional principles and does not protect human dignity. All good reasons to hope for a timely intervention by Ministers Catalfo and Gualtieri “concludes Senator Balboni.
PENSIONS QUOTE 100, 102 AND THE SUPPLEMENTARY FUND FOR YOUNG PEOPLE AND WOMEN: WHAT A STORM! Pensions news
Quota 100 pensions, quota 102 and the proposal of a supplementary public fund with capitalization (for young men and women): the future of the pension reform is becoming day after day one of the hot times of this 2020 in the world of politics and economics. Meanwhile, on the subject of pension reform, the technical working group on the public and private pension system, chaired by President Tiziano Treu and coordinated by Vice-President Gianna Fracassi, took office in Rome, at the CNEL headquarters. The group, made up of Alberto Brambilla, Cesare Damiano, Michele Faioli, Marco Leonardi, Angelo Pandolfo and Michele Raitano, will have instructor tasks, data collection and different positions on the pitch. The team has decided to launch a series of hearings that will begin on January 30 with the major social partner organizations and will continue with all those represented at CNEL to end with the most important experts on the subject. But let’s go over the hot spots in the debate over the past few hours.
PENSIONS: CGIL “SUPPLEMENTARY FUND IS NOT RESPONSE TO YOUNG PEOPLE AND WOMEN” – Pension reform news
“It is a big mistake to think that the pension response for precarious young people and women can be a supplemented public pension fund with capitalization”. This is how the Confederal secretary of the CGIL, Roberto Ghiselli, comments what the president of INPS, Pasquale Tridico, said during the hearing in the Chamber’s work committee. “Those who have a poor or precarious job – he observes – are not in a position to pay enough contributions to build a public pension, let alone if they will ever have the financial resources to make additional payments for an additional Fund. Give a dignified perspective to these workers is one of our priorities. It can be done – continues Ghiselli – by strengthening public security and enhancing social security positions so as to allow even young people and women employed in the most disadvantaged activities to have a decent pension, the one that we call it “guarantee pension pension”. We also consider the idea of a public supplementary fund, competing with the negotiating funds, because – he explains – the function of INPS is not that of managing resources in the financial market “. “The existing negotiating funds, which have given excellent results in the management of workers’ resources in recent years, are seeking to make greater investments in the real Italian economy, also in collaboration with Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, in a prudential and socially responsible logic. “. The Confederation comments on the data illustrated by the president of INPS, Pasquale Tridico, on Quota 100 pensions: “our forecasts were correct. 150 thousand pensions paid with Quota 100 in 2019 fully confirm the estimates elaborated already in April last by the Observatory on CGIL pension provision “recalls the national CGIL public pension manager, Ezio Cigna. “We will therefore have a considerable saving compared to the resources allocated in the Budget law. A saving that will be generated by a lower audience than the preventive one by the Government, only 35%, that is 341,266 instead of 973 thousand people”. “Quota 100 – concludes Ghiselli – in addition to being a term measure, which has not structurally modified the Fornero law, is however a partial and insufficient measure and leaves completely open the need to arrive as soon as possible at a real reform of the social security system, also using the important resources saved “.
PENSIONS: UIL “NO TO PUBLIC INTEGRATIVE FUND MANAGED BY INPS” – Pension reform news
“Uil reaffirms its clear opposition to the establishment of a supplementary public pension fund managed by INPS. Our complementary pension system is already plural, free and concurrent and must be strengthened by relaunching adhesions and restoring taxation. incentive “. This was stated by Domenico Proietti, confederal secretary of Uil. “As for the impact on the Italian economy and the investments of pension funds, it should be remembered that the funds already invest more than a fifth of their resources in our country. If there are still few investments in the real Italian economy – he adds -, this is due to the delay of the financial market that has not been able to offer products consistent with the nature of the pension investment. In this regard, pension funds have sought suitable solutions and with CDP on January 17th a fund of funds will be presented which its purpose is to support the country’s productive activities “, concludes Proietti.
PENSIONS FEE 102 ANIEF: ‘POISONED MEATBALL’ – Pension reform news
FEE 102 PENSIONS AFTER FEE 100? THE POINT OF THE ANIEF – In Europe you go in pension at 63 years and without penalties. In Italy at 67 and with a system that for the new generations foresees a maximum of half of the last salary as a check. No more tax reforms. The policy will reduce costs and separate all non-pension-related expenses from INPS. The leader of the autonomous union rejects without if and without but the pension advance revision model being studied by the Government, who would like raise the minimum threshold for leaving work from 62 to 64, with an absurd further reduction of the pension allowance for the transition to the entire contribution system: “Instead of aligning with the exits from the work of countries close to us such as France, where retirement starts at 62 years without curtailment with confirmed President Emmanuel Macron when he announced the withdrawal of the bill that wanted to raise it to 64 years, from we stand still at 67, with the possibility that they become even more. Not only that, we now want to give a slight advance in exchange for a very high account: because those who accept it would see their contributions paid during their working life cut by a third ”. “The new pension advance on which the government would be working is a poisoned meatball, because compared to Quota 100 it contains a double serious penalty: it increases the minimum entry threshold from 62 years to 64 years and strongly reduces the retirement allowance, since recalculated exclusively with the contribution system “: This is the response of Marcello Pacifico, national president of Anief, to the executive’s desire to introduce a sort of “Quota 102”. The hypothesis that is being worked on is to introduce a new minimum age at 64, instead of the current 62. We would also be thinking about a full recalculation of future pensions with the exclusive contribution calculation system, therefore totally based on the contributions paid by the worker, thus cutting out all those who have several decades to be considered with the most convenient remuneration system. “We believe the offensive proposal for Italian workers – comments the president of the autonomous union Anief – because we are simply trying to be able to retire them later and with checks almost halved compared to those who left their job only a few years ago. Instead of taking legislative action on the Fornero reform, inadmissible advance models are being strategically devised: a worker with over 35 years of contributions has the full right to retire, without being harassed by unfair rules. The conscientious allowance must not involve losing recalculations and the current 62 minimum years of ‘Quota 100’ must not be touched. ” “It is also good – continues the autonomous trade unionist – that the Technical Commission on pensions, which according to the Budget Law 2020 will have to be set up by the end of the month to review the heavy jobs today limited to 11, broaden as soon as possible the categories to be considered as such . Providing for all levels of teaching as burdensome, not only that of kindergarten, as moreover indicated more recent scientific investigations on work-related stress, starting from the fact that we are talking about a profession particularly prone to determining stress and burnout, besides the fact that in Italy we have the oldest teaching staff in the world. Those who teach in Italy should retire at 58 and with 80 per cent of their last salary, with a 20% preferential taxation as in Germany, where at the end of their career they even earn double “.