This is how Amnon Abramovich answered the prime minister’s son’s question


The Prime Minister’s son, Yair Netanyahu, addressed a question to our commentator Amnon Abramovitch as part of the Zoom In program on program three with Ofer Hadad. The question posed by Yair concerned Abramovich’s coverage of Prime Minister Sharon as well as Prime Minister Netanyahu’s legacy. So Abramovich replied.

For more updates and to send your stories – visit the news Facebook page

“Why, when Sharon and his family were caught with millions of dollars in their bank accounts without explanation, did you say that he and his legal-criminal affairs should be interrogated until he finishes deporting the Jews of Gush Katif?” Yair Netanyahu asked, “On the other hand, you say about Netanyahu that he must resign from the beginning of sewing the portfolios in 2016.”

Yair also asked: “I also wanted to know if you still stand by what you said on the eve of the 1999 election, in which you said ‘Netanyahu descends from the stage of history without leaving a mark. He will be a footnote if at all'”?

Abramovich replied: “I am very happy that for the first time you are addressing me in a respectful and polite manner, and not through defamation, cursing or insulting and therefore I will also answer you with due respect. Look, I against Sharon brought the most difficult news, including about his interrogation. Those, the files did not get the numbers of the thousands, rather they got nicknames and it was reported in the media that there is a case called ‘Rotten Apple’ in which the contractor David Apple was investigated.

Yair Netanyahu | Photo: Jonathan Zindel, Flash 90

“I revealed the existence of an investigation called ‘Red Carpet’ in which Sharon and his sons are being questioned, and at the same time I talked about the etrog issue that came up in February 2005. I can tell you that Mr. Netanyahu loved it so much, and remembered it so well, that in May-August 2009 He asked me to retire from the media and come to work with him and talk to him and talk about his expected policy.The dates are important here, May-August 2009 it is around Bar Ilan’s speech.

As for the deportation, I will only remind you, Mr. Netanyahu supported the ‘deportation’, he voted for him in 4 out of 5 votes in the Knesset and the government and if you dig in the archives you will hear him turn to Uri Ariel from the Knesset podium I will do everything for the disengagement to pass. ‘

“As for Mr. Netanyahu’s interrogations, I brought a number of significant reports that supported him. For example, I published that there was no funding mechanism for Bibi-Tours. For example, I published that Arnon Milchen made a U-turn and it is called a big puncture in the police and the prosecutor’s office I also added that a good lawyer can take action in Netanyahu’s cases, and this statement was echoed and certainly had meaning.

“I will tell you this, what bothers me about Netanyahu is not his three cases, but the blatant, direct incitement against law enforcement and the judiciary. As for the cases, he is destined and the court will decide, but this incitement against state institutions is unforgivable. .

Amnon Abramovitch (Photo: News 12)
Amnon Abramovich | Photo: The News 12

“Regarding your second question: it turns out that I watched from a distance, because if Mr. Netanyahu had ended his career in the summer of 1999, he would indeed have been as I said. But what happens here? Today if he ends his term and I do not know if evil is not yet before us, he will be remembered as This people, as one who tried part by part, as one who incited against the state authorities and more will be remembered as one who always preferred the personal-private interest over the national interest.

“For example, Mr. Netanyahu had a view that he expressed for many years against benefits and for work, and for bringing the ultra-Orthodox sector into Israeli society. There is a book called ‘With Open Eyes’ by economist Moshe Pearl that talks about how a company destroys itself. You know who recommended Lee on this book? Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“Finally, I do not know how history will remember him, but there is one statistic worth noting. In Netanyahu’s time, the influx of Israelis seeking foreign passports intensified, and it is true that the foreign passport lies in a drawer, but it also lies in consciousness. I and my family see ourselves As stones from the stones of this place – I can not tell you that this phenomenon of foreign passports that have far-reaching significance, does not burn my heart. ”

The prime minister’s son, Yair Netanyahu, later posted on his Twitter account a response to Abramovich’s answer in which he wrote that “you did not answer my questions at all, especially not about the etrog, and instead entered your personal opinion on Netanyahu.”

Source link by

*The article has been translated based on the content of Source link by
. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here