The troubled Anderlecht saw a three-pointer again drilled through the nose against Eupen on Sunday. A blunder from defender Luckassen cost the Purple & White the victory. In Extra Time analyst Arnar Vidarsson mentioned a pattern, because RSCA appears to have a patent on late counter goals.
The games of RSCA this season:
1- KV Mechelen – Anderlecht 2-2 (goals against after 83 and 85 minutes)
2- Anderlecht – STVV 3-1 (goal against after 88 minutes)
3- Anderlecht – Mouscron 1-1 (goal against after 93 minutes)
4- KV Oostende – Anderlecht 2-2 (goals against after 11 and 34 minutes)
5- Anderlecht – Cercle Brugge 2-0
6- Waasland-Beveren – Anderlecht 2-4 (against goals after 64 and 88 minutes)
7- Anderlecht – Eupen 1-1 (goal against after 90 minutes)
“Lack of maturity and experience”
“It is striking that Anderlecht conceded many goals in the last 10 minutes. That has already cost them 6 points this season. If that does not happen, Anderlecht now have 19/21 and Charleroi is in the lead, it’s that simple”, Arnar Vidarsson knows.
“It was also the case last season: too many goals in the final phase of the match. You see that Anderlecht are often less strong in the second half and in the final phase of a match. Eupen, too, saw you getting into the match better on Sunday. . “
“Why is that? Fatigue, anyway. But also due to a lack of experience. A team like Charleroi, with a lot of maturity and experience, does not encounter this.”
*The article has been translated based on the content of Source link by https://sporza.be/nl/2020/09/29/-zonder-al-die-late-tegengoals-staat-anderlecht-nu-met-19-op-21-op-kop~1601364969706/
. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!