two zoning plan changes, one for rent and allocation decision, stanbul
Take a case against Bykehir Municipality.
AK PART GROUP HAS DECIDED ISRAR
the vegan itself vetoed, but the AK Party
2 zoning amendments accepted by voting school by taking decision and one allocation-transfer
verdict to court.
BB Assembly received on October 17, 2019 702 sayl “Esenler, Baakehir,
Kathane, Eypsultan, province and Beikta provinces in various islands and parcels
the decision to make a change of plan as the parking area of the unidentified people “,
703 sayl on October 18, 2019 “Various in Baheehir and Tuzla provinces
the parks, roads, earthquakes and gathering areas of the tanmazlar in the island and the parcel
plan change “decision and no. 934 on 27 November 2019” Miscellaneous
allocation and transfer of parcels “the decision was vetoed by mamamo.
Following the veto, the AK Party BB Group, which also made a proposal in the decision, changed
By bringing the proposal back to vote and voting, the question has been decided and
ACCEPTED WITH VOTE SCHOOL
Plan change 70 October 17, 2019 and 703 October 18, 2019
decisions, admission to the opposition of the CHP and Y Party groups, by voting school
Decisions adopted were returned to the BB Assembly by mamolu on 23 October 2019
It was. 702 and 703 numbered resolutions that were voted on again in the BB Assembly,
come with a vote.
“Allocation and transfer of various parcels” with 934 number requested.
In the decision, with the AK Party of some land in Gngren and Sultangazi
with free transfer to their municipalities with Sultanbeyli, Gaziosmanpaa, Eyp, Baclar,
For the free allocation of some lands in Gngren and Esenler, the AK Party
BB Group submitted an offer with the signature of Deputy Group Minister Tevfik Gksu. Offer, BB
It was accepted by voting in the Assembly. BB Minister Ekrem mamolu, decision veto
He. AK Party Group, again to the BB Assembly agenda
and the proposal was accepted with a vote again.
STOP THE DECISION OF DECISIONS AND STALN STED
According to Independent Trke’s news, the proposal vetoed and re-voted
Ekrem Mamolu after srar karary finalization, on 24 January, stanbul
3. By referring to the Administrative Court, the Bykehir Municipality Law
He used his authority. BB Minister to stop the court from tearing the decisions
and requested his cancellation.
BYKEHR AUTHORIZES BELEDYES LAW
By re-voting and finalizing their proposals, by Mamolu, Bykehir Municipality
He used the authority given to him in article 14 of the Law. With Article 14:
Bykehir municipality minister, illegal city council decisions,
within seven days, the municipality is to be seen again by stating its necessity
can return it to the assembly.
With decisions that are not wanted to be seen again,
bykehir city council, the absolute majority of the exact number
decisions are finalized.
Bykehir municipality minister, against the decisions of the council with certainty
may appeal to administrative jurisdiction.
DISCLAIMER AND MARKING OF MAR LAW EXPLORE
at the court case against mamolu’s decisions 702 and 703,
In the case of the 934 numbered judgment, which is against the Law of Mar,
Decision without having to examine who owns the right of ownership and use.
alnd is specified.