Mes, the survey on the state-saving fund: six out of ten Italians do not know what it is


Mes, spread, bail in. What are we talking about? The vast majority of Italians have not understood the main topic of these last weeks. Newspapers, television debates and interventions on the social networks of politicians on the Mes unleash the political "fans", without however allowing a pipe to be understood.

Two recent surveys testify to this ignorance. The Demopolis Institute verified the knowledge of Italians in relation to the so-called "Save-States". You have understood – was asked – what is the MES, the European stability mechanism? "Yes, exactly" just 9% of respondents respond; 25% said they understood it, but only in general. 66%, two Italians out of 3 interviewed by Demopolis, affirm instead that they have not understood what it is.

Also read: Mes, the accusation of Guido Crosetto to the "conspiracy government"

According to an EMG Acqua survey presented yesterday in Agora on Raitre, to the question "Have you understood what the Mes is for?" Replied "YES" 41% of the total respondents, "NO" 31%. While 26% answered "I don't know what the Mes / I am not informed". 2% prefer not to answer.

There is a reason, however, that justifies the voters: not even politicians are masters of the subject. There are those who are alarmist, those who try to reassure. Nobody, in an objective and clear way, is able to make a quick summary of the subject. Reason? Few read the papers. So should we study them ourselves, downloading files from the web? Yesterday morning, at dawn, Minister Gualtieri sang victory with these words: "We have achieved an important thing which is the possibility of a sub-aggregation of titles: a mechanism that makes CAC single limbs more similar to double limbs. For Italy it was important ".

This for the Mes. Instead the discussion on the banking union and the European deposit guarantee scheme was "long and difficult", but Italy "obtained the elimination from the road map of references to the modification of the prudential treatment of sovereign bonds". And again: "All the hypotheses of backstop conditionality have been rejected", the minister explained, "ie the guarantor of last resort for the single resolution fund. "It is a mechanism of mutualisation of resources without conditionality, and it is the first case at European level". If he says so …

It is right that Gualtieri, a professor of history, uses technical terms, but if he talks with the press, which in theory should explain to citizens what politicians combine, it is not permissible to use terms such as "subaggregation", "single limb Cac", " backstop ". Surely if one of his students had presented himself at the examination, showing off terms from experts, Prof. Gualtieri would have asked him to speak simple. The minister continues to repeat that there are no problems for Italy, which does not change much compared to the old Mes. So what is the reason to reform it?

of Giuliano Zulin

Source link



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

15 − 13 =