To re-read his statements in the only interview on Ilva ad Business & Finance the June 18, 2018 one wonders how today Morselli can lead ArcelorMittal. The long talk about the race and the future of Taranto was a tough one indictment to the management of ban by the extraordinary commissioners and a violent criticism of the buyers' plans. With several great truths, especially in light of what has happened since then until today. Morselli explained the importance for Ilva's Italy, which now wants to shrink or return to the State: "Italy is a country of artisans, from fashion to mechanics". And the mechanics "From the most sophisticated to the most banal of bolts, it is made of steel".
Our country, Morselli recalled, "has historically satisfied its own internal requirement and exported steel ”. And warned about the risks to the market of an eventual default of the steel industry of Taranto, through an episode of the 2014, when he drove theAst of Terni: "I was in Brussels for the introduction of duties to protect the European steel industry and reading the statistics together with the other steel companies – told ad Business & Finance – we saw that in Italy and in Europe there had been surges imports. We worried we said that it was the fault of the Ilva crisis. A single plant was creating a problem for the whole EU ”.
He then explained that the Taranto plant "must be the pivot of a." large commercial traffic, which extends beyond the steel industry "and recalled that Acciaitalia, its consortium of the time, had put in place a plan for a "Serious decarbonisation process", which instead ArcelorMittal has always branded as imaginative. And it had entered the slippery terrain of the final part of the race, when a part of Acciaitalia (Jindal is Delfin, not ‘his Cassa Depositi e Prestiti) had attempted a relaunch on the price which would have substantially balanced the economic offer of ArcelorMittal. "How come they won? According to some newspaper articles – he explained referring to the documents revealed by Daily fact – the technical evaluation of comparison of the respective industrial plans is environmental was that Mittal's plan was "inconsistent on." investments is production volumes as well as on employment '". But they offered more money than in the last minute his consortium tried to equalize.
"We immediately asked to be able to improve our economic offer, naturally also leaving the possibility of improving our own. But, he emphasized, "they did not give us the opportunity to do so" even if "in a hearing at the Production Activities Commission of the Senate, a February 2016, the possibility of a "raise phase" had been confirmed ". So the lunge: "We have not asked to change the rules, only to apply them. Let us remember – he added – that thenational interest is the prevailing rule of the Extraordinary Administration ”.
Morselli also explained that the wait for the judgment of theEuropean Antitrust, already known in the tender phase and only necessary in the event of acquisition by ArcelorMittal, and the long negotiations with the labor unions they had in fact "burnt" the surcharge because in the meantime the steelworks had remained in the hands of the commissioners with its relative losses month after month. It would have been simpler if Acciaitalia had won: the lead "Jindal liked the unions because he would make Ilva his single development center in Europe, not one of the many branches of an empire that has its center elsewhere ". Italy in Taranto "had the most great and the most modern steelworks in Europe, and we have let many – perhaps the most advanced – of its own ovens they went out ", concluded Morselli. ArcelorMittal had assured him that he would put everything back together. Now it's up to you to give the order to bring them to a minimum or maybe turn the last valve.