The defections in the conservative camp continued, Thursday, after the "coup" Boris Johnson. The opposition is preparing its legislative counter-attack.
Did Boris Johnson prejudge his strength, underestimated the reaction of the deputies, of the street? His brutal decision to suspend the British Parliament for five long weeks, starting from the 9 September, caused very strong aftershocks, Thursday, August 29. Especially in the conservative ranks. This exceptionally long "extension" of the two Houses (Communes and Lords) drastically reduces the room for maneuver of the elected to discuss a possible new agreement with Brussels or to oppose a "no deal" on 31 October.
The rumor was already running the day before: on Thursday morning, Ruth Davidson, the leader of the Scottish Conservatives confirmed her resignation, "For family reasons" (she has a toddler), but also because "The conflict I felt about Brexit". Mme Davidson was particularly respected in the Conservative camp, that of the prime minister, for having been able to earn him thirteen Scottish seats in the last general election, limiting the supremacy of the SNP, the nationalist party.
Ruth Davidson, however, avoided any direct criticism of the prime minister on Thursday. The suspension of Westminster? "It still gives members the opportunity to vote for a divorce agreement with the European Union. " If he brings back an agreement from Brussels, "For God's sake, support him", she added, who voted for EU membership in 2016. The departure of this rather centrist figure has, however, been widely interpreted in the British media as a reaction to Boris Johnson's "coup". It also weakens the conservative camp in Edinbourgh, making it even more likely, in case of no agreement with the EU, the convening of a second referendum on Scottish independence.
Former Minister George Young also stepped down as the government's "whip" (coordinator) in the House of Lords on Thursday, advancing in a letter that he felt "Really unhappy with the timing, the duration of the suspension, and its motivations". The latter appeared obvious: Mr. Johnson fears that he will have no majority, either for an agreement or for a non-agreement, in the House of Commons, and wants to limit his blocking capacity as much as possible.